QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MUNTZ, W.R. A. Articles by GWYTHER, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by MUNTZ, W.R. A. Articles by GWYTHER, J.

Journal of Experimental Biology 140,345-353 (1988)
Published by Company of Biologists 1988

Visual Discrimination of Distance by Octopuses

W.R. A. MUNTZ ¹ and J. GWYTHER ¹

¹ Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

If two stimuli are presented to an octopus simultaneously, but at different distances from the animal, the nearer of the two is usually attacked. This preference was used to test the ability of octopuses to discriminate distance. White discs, 37 mm in diameter, were used as stimuli, and two parameters were varied: the distance of the farther stimulus from the animal (D), and the difference between the distances of the farther and nearer stimulus (d). Animals chose the nearer stimulus on 70% of occasions under the most difficult conditions used, where D was 370 mm and d was 50mm. This percentage increased as D decreased or d increased. Further tests showed that varying the size of the discs, or using white vertical or horizontal rectangles instead of discs as stimuli, did not affect performance.

The most likely cue being used by the animals to discriminate distances is accommodation. If this is the case octopuses can detect blurring of points on the retinal image comparable in size to a single retinal receptor, and lens displacements of around 10 µm

Key words: octopus, vision, distance discrimination

Accepted on June 23, 1988

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. H. Douglas, R. Williamson, and H.-J. Wagner The pupillary response of cephalopods J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 261 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]