|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
The Importance of Torsion in the Design of Insect Wings
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS; Department of Biological Science, University of York, Heslington, YorkYO1 5DD
A model insect wing is described in which spars of corrugated membrane which incorporate stiffening veins branch serially from a V-section leading edge spar. The mechanical behaviour of this model is analysed.
The open, corrugated spars possess great resistance to bending, but are compliant in torsion. Torsion of the leading edge spar will result in torsion and relative movement of the rear spars. As a result camber will automatically be set up in the wing as it twists.
Aerodynamic forces produced during the wing strokes will result in torsion and camber of the wing which should improve its aerodynamic efficiency.
The effects of varying parameters of the wing model are examined. For given wing torsion, higher camber is given by spars branching from the leading edge at a lower angle, by spars which curve posteriorly, and by spars which diverge from each other.
Wings of three species of flies were each subjected to two series of mechanical tests. Application of a force behind the torsional axis caused the wings to twist and to develop camber. Immobilizing basal regions of the leading edge greatly reduced compliance to torsion and camber, as predicted by the theoretical model. Aerodynamic forces produced during a half-stroke are sufficient to produce observed values of torsion and camber, and to maintain changes in pitch caused by inertial effects at stroke reversal.
Key words: insect, wing, torsion, camber, flight
Accepted on May 5, 1988
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F.-O. Lehmann When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake wing interference in insect wings J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 224 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Mezey, D. Houle, and S. V. Nuzhdin Naturally Segregating Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Wing Shape of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2101 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2979 - 2987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2989 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. L. Daniel and S. A. Combes Flexible Wings and Fins: Bending by Inertial or Fluid-Dynamic Forces? Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2002; 42(5): 1044 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1547 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. WATTS, E. J. MITCHELL, and S. M. SWARTZ A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE MECHANICS OF HORIZONTAL FLAPPING FLIGHT IN BATS: MODEL DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2873 - 2898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Golding, A. Ennos, and M Edmunds Similarity in flight behaviour between the honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: apidae) and its presumed mimic, the dronefly Eristalis tenax (Diptera: syrphidae) J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2001; 204(1): 139 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Wootton Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3333 - 3345. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
