QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DAVIES, M. N.O. Articles by GREEN, P. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by DAVIES, M. N.O. Articles by GREEN, P. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology 138,71-91 (1988)
Published by Company of Biologists 1988

Head-Bobbing During Walking, Running and Flying: Relative Motion Perception in the Pigeon

MARK N.O. DAVIES ¹ and PATRICK R. GREEN ²

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
² Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Measurements of head and body velocity were made by single-frame analysis of films showing pigeons walking, running, flying towards a perch and taking off from the ground. A rhythm of head velocity was always observed in the first three situations, but never in the last. During walking, this head-bobbing rhythm resulted in stabilization of the head relative to the surroundings for a part of each cycle. During running or flying towards a perch, this stabilization did not occur, and the head continued to move forwards throughout the cycle. The velocity of head movement at the minimum of the cycle increased smoothly with body speed in the range of body speeds from 75cms^-1 upwards, with no indication of any discontinuity between running and flight. The results provide evidence that headbobbing is not a mechanical consequence of cursorial or flight activity, and that its visual functions must include others besides stabilization of the retinal image. It is suggested that head-bobbing has the dual function of amplifying relative motion in the retinal image during the thrust phase, making the detection of food objects more likely, while allowing detection of object motion during the hold phase.

Key words: head-bobbing, pigeon, visuomotor behaviour

Accepted on March 9, 1988

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Maurice, H. Gioanni, and A. Abourachid Influence of the behavioural context on the optocollic reflex (OCR) in pigeons (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 292 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Kramer and R. L. McLaughlin The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 137 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Troje and B. Frost Head-bobbing in pigeons: how stable is the hold phase? J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2000; 203(5): 935 - 940. [Abstract] [PDF]