spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GAL, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GAL, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, R. W.
Journal of Experimental Biology 138,399-411 (1988)
Published by Company of Biologists 1988


Biomechanics of Frog Swimming : I. Estimation of the Propulsive Force Generated by Hymenochirus Boettgeri

JULIANNA M. GAL 1 and R. W. BLAKE 2

1 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
2 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada

Ciné films were used to study swimming in the frog, Hymenochirus boettgeri (Tornier) during near-vertical breathing excursions. The animals generally decelerated during hindlimb flexion (recovery phase) and accelerated throughout hindlimb extension (power phase). Body velocity patterns of frogs are distinct from those of other drag-based paddlers, such as angelfish and water boatman, where the body is accelerated and decelerated within the power stroke phase. The propulsive force, estimated for a single sequence from quasi-steady drag and inertial considerations, was positive throughout extension. The upper and lower bounds of this estimate were calculated by considering additional components of the force balance, including the net effect of gravity and buoyancy, and the longitudinal added mass forces associated with the body. Consideration of the force balance implies that simple drag-based propulsion may not be sufficient to explain the swimming patterns observed in frogs.

Key words: frog, swimming biomechanics, motion analysis, drag

Accepted on March 16, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley
Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. J. Stamhuis and S. Nauwelaerts
Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs II. Application of a vortex ring model to DPIV data
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1445 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. C. Johansson and G. V. Lauder
Hydrodynamics of surface swimming in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens)
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3945 - 3958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Gillis and A. Biewener
Hindlimb extensor muscle function during jumping and swimming in the toad (Bufo marinus)
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2000; 203(23): 3547 - 3563.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Nauen and R. Shadwick
The scaling of acceleratory aquatic locomotion: body size and tail-flip performance of the california spiny lobster panulirus interruptus
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 1999; 202(22): 3181 - 3193.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1988