spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tufts, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Randall, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tufts, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Randall, D. J.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 128, Issue 1 411-418, Copyright © 1987 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The effects of forced activity on circulating catecholamines and pH and water content of erythrocytes in the toad

BL Tufts, DC Mense and DJ Randall

In vivo experiments were carried out to determine the effect of forced activity on circulating catecholamine levels, haematocrit, and the pH and water content of erythrocytes in the toad, Bufo marinus. In addition, the effect of the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol on erythrocyte pH and water content was examined in vitro. Forced activity caused a significant decrease in both whole blood and erythrocyte pH, while haematocrit and circulating adrenaline and noradrenaline levels increased. Erythrocyte water content did not change following forced activity. Addition of isoproterenol to toad blood in vitro had no effect on either erythrocyte pH or water content. The apparent absence of beta-adrenergic effects on erythrocyte pH and water content in the toad is in sharp contrast to the response of teleost fish erythrocytes to beta-adrenergic stimulation. The significance of these differences is discussed.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1987