spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PENNYCUICK, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PENNYCUICK, C. J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 128,335-347 (1987)
Published by Company of Biologists 1987


Flight of Auks (Alcidae) and Other Northern Seabirds Compared with Southern Procellariiformes: Ornithodolite Observations

C. J. PENNYCUICK 1

1 Department of Biology, University of Miami, PO Box 249118, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA

Airspeeds in flapping and flap-gliding flight were measured at Foula, Shetland for three species of auks (Alcidae), three gulls (Landae), two skuas (Stercorariidae), the fulmar (Procellariidae), the gannet (Sulidae) and the shag (Phalacrocoracidae). The airspeed distributions were consistent with calculated speeds for minimum power and maximum range, except that observed speeds in the shag were unexpectedly low in relation to the calculated speeds. This is attributed to scale effects that cause the shag to have insufficient muscle power to fly much faster than its minimum power speed. The wing adaptations seen in different species are considered as deviations from a ‘procellariiform standard’, which produce separate effects on flapping and gliding speeds. Procellariiformes and the gannet flap-glide in cruising flight, but birds that swim with their wings do not, because their gliding speeds are too high in relation to their flapping speeds. Other species in the sample also do not flap-glide, but the reason is that their gliding speeds are too low in relation to their flapping speeds.

Key words: flight, seabirds, ornithodolite

Accepted on November 17, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. S. Bridge
The effects of intense wing molt on diving in alcids and potential influences on the evolution of molt patterns
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 3003 - 3014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. Tremblay, Y. Cherel, M. Oremus, T. Tveraa, and O. Chastel
Unconventional ventral attachment of time-depth recorders as a new method for investigating time budget and diving behaviour of seabirds
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2003; 206(11): 1929 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Lovvorn, D. Croll, and G. Liggins
Mechanical versus physiological determinants of swimming speeds in diving Brunnich's guillemots
J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(13): 1741 - 1752.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1987