spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MILSOM, W.K.
Right arrow Articles by CHAN, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MILSOM, W.K.
Right arrow Articles by CHAN, P.
Journal of Experimental Biology 120,233-247 (1986)
Published by Company of Biologists 1986


The Relationship between Lung Volume, Respiratory Drive and Breathing Pattern in the Turtle, Chrysemys Picta

W.K. MILSOM 1 and P. CHAN 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 2A9

Induced changes in resting lung volume (VLR) in the turtle Chrysemys picta (Schneider) had no effect on resting levels of minute ventilation in animals breathing room air but did change their breathing pattern. Increasing VLR caused an increase in the number of breaths in each episode (burst) of breathing but a reduction in the incidence of such breathing bursts and thus an increase in the length of periods of breath-holding. The data indicate that these effects were largely the consequence of changes in lung volume per se rather than changes in lung gas stores.

Although both hypoxia and hypercapnia stimulated ventilation via increases in tidal volume and breathing frequency, they produced distinct changes in breathing pattern. While hypoxia (3% O2) caused an increase in the number of bursts of breathing (B/min) and reduced the number of breaths (b) in each burst (b/B), hypercapnia (5% CO2) increased both B/min and b/B. These data suggest that the size and incidence of bursts of breathing must be under separate control. One consequence of the different effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on breaths per burst (b/B) was that hypoxic-hypercapnic gas mixtures (3% O2+5% CO2) failed to stimulate ventilation as much as hypercapnia alone.

Administration of hypoxic, hypercapnic and hypoxic-hypercapnic gas mixtures to elevate respiratory drive eliminated the effects of changes in VLR on breathing pattern. Thus, although changes in VLR are important in the control of breathholding in animals breathing air, their effect decreases as respiratory drive increases.

Key words: control of breathing, pulmonary receptors, ventilatory responses

Accepted on June 24, 1985







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1986