spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GUNN, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GUNN, D. L.
Journal of Experimental Biology 12,185-190 (1935)
Published by Company of Biologists 1935


The Temperature and Humidity Relations of the Cockroach : III. A Comparison of Temperature Preference, and Rates of Desiccation and Respiration of Periplaneta americana, Blatta orientalis and Blatella germanica

D. L. GUNN 1

1 Zoology Department, University of Birmingham

1. The rates of desiccation of three species of cockroaches (Periplaneta americana, Blatta orientalis and Blatella germanica) in dry air at various temperatures have been compared (Fig. 1). There are clear specific differences.

2. The rates of respiration of the three species are proportional to the weight to the power of 0 75-0 8.

3. In all three species, at 30° C. in dry air the animal loses about 6 mg. of water by evaporation for every 1 mg. of oxygen consumed. The smallest species (Blatella germanica), with the thinnest cuticle, loses least rapidly per unit surface area. These facts are consistent with the previous conclusion that the water passes through both the spiracles and the cuticle.

4. The upper limit of preferred temperature of Periplaneta americana and Blatella germanica is 33° C, while for Blatta orientalis it is 29° C. The lower limit is not so sharply defined and further work is required before it can be regarded as significant.

5. Certain suggestions are made concerning the ecological significance of the observations described.

Submitted on December 5, 1934







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1935