spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RYAN, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by RYAN, M. J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 116,47-52 (1985)
Published by Company of Biologists 1985


Energetic Efficiency of Vocalization by the Frog Physalaemus Pustulosus

MICHAEL J. RYAN 1

1 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A.; Department of Zoology, University of Taxas, Austin, Taxes 78712, U.S.A.

1. Male Physalaemus pustulosus consume, on average, 1.2 µl of oxygen in the production of a single call, which is equivalent to an energy input per call of 0.024 J.

2. The total power of complex calls, which can have a varying number of components, ranged from 0.36 to 0.46 mW. The total acoustic energy contained in these complex calls ranged from 0.12 to 0.30mJ.

3. The energetic efficiency of the vocalization ranged from 0.5 to 1.2% which is similar to the range estimated for some other animals.

4. The low energetic efficiency of vocalization by these frogs is due, in part, to the fact that the wavelengths of the call are too long, relative to the size of the frog, to be radiated efficiently.

5. Although shorter wavelengths (higher frequencies) are radiated by the frog at relatively greater intensities, longer wavelengths (lower frequencies) attenuate less rapidly in the environment. It is suggested that selection generated by the acoustics of the environment favours calls with lower frequencies, but the morphology of the animal sets a lower limit to which frequencies can evolve.

Key words: Vocalization, energetics, Anuran

Accepted on September 4, 1984







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1985