spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, R. E.
Journal of Experimental Biology 114,619-647 (1985)
Published by Company of Biologists 1985


Flight Physiology of Flying Foxes, Pteropus Poliocephalus

Roger E. Carpenter 1

1 Department of Zoology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, U.S.A.

Oxygen consumption was measured during flight in two flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus) at airspeeds of 4–8.6ms-1. There was good agreement with the measured power input of the only previously measured large bat, and with an allometric equation predicting power input for flying vertebrates. Measurements of respiratory exchange ratios, pulmonary water loss, respiratory frequencies, heart rates and body temperatures of both bats flying at intermediate airspeeds were compared with equivalent measurements on other bats or birds in flight. Despite a high non-evaporative thermal conductance in flight, the P. poliocephalus became severely hyperthermic at ambient temperatures (Ta) above 25°C. The failure to dissipate heat as successfully as flying birds at high Ta is apparently the result of an inability to increase pulmonary ventilation rates, and thus increase rates of evaporative heat loss.

The effect of airspeed on endurance was measured systematically on one bat. Endurance was not limited by energy reserves at all airspeeds, and flight times were significantly greater at the airspeed of minimum power input (Vmp). The endurance of both bats was so reduced at the higher airspeeds that they would not achieve maximum flight range in still air at the velocity where cost of locomotion is lowest. Contrary to a common assumption, flight range would be maximized at the Vmp.

Key words: Bat flight, metabolism, heart rate, temperature regulation, evaporative water loss, endurance.

Accepted on August 2, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. W. Peters, D. A. Steiner, J. A. Rigoni, A. D. Mascilli, R. W. Schnepp, and S. P. Thomas
Cardiorespiratory adjustments of homing pigeons to steady wind tunnel flight
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3109 - 3120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. D. Bullen and N. L. McKenzie
Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2615 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. WATTS, E. J. MITCHELL, and S. M. SWARTZ
A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE MECHANICS OF HORIZONTAL FLAPPING FLIGHT IN BATS: MODEL DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION
J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2873 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J Wong and D Waters
The synchronisation of signal emission with wingbeat during the approach phase in soprano pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus)
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(3): 575 - 583.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Maina
What it takes to fly: the structural and functional respiratory refinements in birds and bats
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(20): 3045 - 3064.
[Abstract]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1985