spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hisada, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Takahata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hisada, M.
Journal of Experimental Biology 114,599-617 (1985)
Published by Company of Biologists 1985


Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Crayfish Steering Behaviour as an Equilibrium Response

M. Takahata 1, M. Yoshino 2, and M. Hisada 1

1 Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, 060 Sapporo, Japan
2 Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, 060 Sapporo, Japan: Department of Ncuniphysiology, Sapporo Medical College, Chuoku, Sapporo 060, Japan.

1. When the crayfish Procambarus is rolled with legs not upon a substratum, uropod opener muscles on the lifted side are activated in co-contraction whereas antagonistic closer muscles on the same side are all relaxed simultaneously. The closers are activated and the openers are relaxed on the lowered side.

2. This reciprocal pattern is also observed in the motor neurone activity: the contraction of opener muscles on the lifted side and closer muscles on the lowered side is caused by an increase in the activity of excitatory motor neurones innervating these muscles, whereas the relaxation of their antagonists on each side is caused by a decrease in the activity of excitatory motor neurones innervating them. Deafferentation by cutting all roots of the terminal ganglion has no significant effect on the steering pattern.

3. The decrease in the excitatory motor neurone activity during steering was found to be due to an increase in the inhibitory input to the motor neurones.

4. During body rolling, the statocyst receptors on the lifted side increase their activity while those on the lowered side decrease it (Takahata & Hisada, 1979). We conclude that the opener motor neurones receive excitation and inhibition respectively from the ipsilateral and the contralateral statocyst, whereas the closer motor neurones receive excitation and inhibition respectively from the contralateral and ipsilateral statocyst. From these results, the connections between the motor neurones and the identified statocyst interneurones were deduced.

5. The normal, bilaterally organized steering pattern of the uropod muscle activity seems to be produced by the statocysts of both sides, whose information is mediated by a bilateral set of interneurones having different connections to individual motor neurones.

Key words: Crayfish, equilibrium response, statocyst interneurones.

Accepted on August 1, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. G. Deliagina, G. N. Orlovsky, A. I. Selverston, and Y. I. Arshavsky
Neuronal Mechanisms for the Control of Body Orientation in Clione I. Spatial Zones of Activity of Different Neuron Groups
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 687 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1985