QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heitler, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heitler, W. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 114, Issue 1 521-549, Copyright © 1985 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Motor programme switching in the crayfish swimmeret system

WJ Heitler

Intracellular and extracellular recordings have been made from neurones of the swimmeret system in the semi-isolated abdominal ganglion of the crayfish during rhythmic activity. Extracellular recordings commonly reveal a motor programme (MP1) consisting of low-amplitude symmetrical power and return stroke activity with phase-constant posterior-to-anterior intersegmental coordination. Occasionally a different motor programme (MP2) is expressed. MP2 has higher amplitude episodic activity, with return stroke duration greater than power stroke, and with latency-constant anterior-to-posterior or near synchronous intersegmental coordination. Preparations may switch spontaneously between the two motor programmes. Intracellular recordings show that interneurones whose membrane potentials oscillate during MP1 and which can reset its rhythm usually cease to oscillate during MP2. During production of MP1, current injected into any one of a small number of interneurones can induce MP2. The polarity of current required is usually such as to drive the membrane potential towards the level normally associated with return stroke during MP1. During MP1 many motor neurones receive synaptic input with approximately sinusoidal waveform. During MP2 they may receive an episodic input with approximately sawtooth waveform, and/or input consisting of large, unitary EPSPs. The unitary EPSPs drive a 'bursty' mode of MP2 activity that is sometimes seen. The bursts of unitary EPSPs in MP2 appear to derive from a different source to that of the sinusoidal input in MP1. These sources are probably caudally-conducting through-interneurones and non-spiking local interneurones respectively. Thus experimental perturbation of a single neurone can induce a motor programme switch such as to change the activity of some hundreds of neurones in at least three ganglia. Neurones with this property would be convenient targets for controlling influences in the intact animal.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Sasaki, J. Jing, M. R. Due, and K. R. Weiss An Input-Representing Interneuron Regulates Spike Timing and Thereby Phase Switching in a Motor Network J. Neurosci., February 20, 2008; 28(8): 1916 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Ritter, D. H. Bhatt, and J. R. Fetcho In Vivo Imaging of Zebrafish Reveals Differences in the Spinal Networks for Escape and Swimming Movements J. Neurosci., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 8956 - 8965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Berkowitz Rhythmicity of Spinal Neurons Activated During Each Form of Fictive Scratching in Spinal Turtles J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 1026 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wu, L. Cohen, and C. Falk Neuronal activity during different behaviors in Aplysia: a distributed organization? Science, February 11, 1994; 263(5148): 820 - 823. [Abstract] [PDF]