spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Long, S.
Right arrow Articles by Skadhauge, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Long, S.
Right arrow Articles by Skadhauge, E.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 104, Issue 1 41-50, Copyright © 1983 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The role of urinary precipitates in the excretion of electrolytes and urate in the domestic fowl

S Long and E Skadhauge

1. In order to quantify losses of Na and K associated with precipitate fractions in semi-solid avian urines, Na, K, uric acid and urates (UA + U) and inulin were measured in plasma, in whole ureteral urine, and in urinary precipitates of hens. Ten animals were used, five fed a control commercial poultry meal (Diet A) and five maintained on a high protein, low-Na feed (Diet B). 2. In ureteral urines from hens on Diet A, dried precipitate accounted for 5.6% of the total whole urine weight, on the average. UA + U constituted about two-thirds of the precipitates' weight and 80% of the total excreted UA + U load of 97.4 mM. The average molar fractions, [Na]/[UA + U] and [K]/[UA + U], in precipitates were in the range 0.1-0.2; and the Na and K lost in these fractions were 12.8 mequiv and 9.6 mequiv, respectively, per 1 whole urine. These losses represent 9% and 23% of total Na and K excretion. 3. Diet B was used to accentuate potential cation loss in precipitates if obligatory binding of K and especially Na were to occur in precipitates. Urinary [UA + U] in whole urine rose to 146 mM of which 95% was found in precipitates. The average molar fraction [Na]/[UA + U], however, fell to 0.06 and that of [K]/[UA + U] to 0.08. Renal loss of Na was 8.5 mequiv and of K was 11.5 mequiv per 1 whole urine. 4. These experiments reveal that significant but minor fractions of excreted Na and K are associated with precipitates of avian urine, although the loss is insignificant compared to that reported in starlings (Braun, 1978). They further indicate that the Na/inulin clearance ratio, based on measurements in whole urine and plasma, adequately reflects fractional excretion which, on Diet A, was 1.8% of the filtered load and, on the Na-poor Diet B, less than 0.1%. These values place the Na-reabsorbing abilities of these birds easily within the range reported for ureotelic vertebrates and suggest that uricotelism does not impose a major renal salt loss in birds.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. Roxburgh and B. Pinshow
Ammonotely in a passerine nectarivore: the influence of renal and post-renal modification on nitrogenous waste product excretion
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2002; 205(12): 1735 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1983