|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Stick Insect Locomotion on a Walking Wheel: Interleg Coordination of Leg Position
1 Zoologisches Institut, Universitaet zu Koeln; Fakultaet fuer Biologie, Universitaet Bielefeld, Postfach 8640, D-4800 Bielefeld 1, F.R.G.
2 Zoologisches Institut, Universitaet zu Koeln
Continuous measurements of anterior-posterior leg position recorded from stick insects walking on a wheel were tested for relationships among spatial and temporal parameters of leg coordination. This analysis revealed that the protraction of middle and rear legs is guided by the ipsilateral front and middle legs respectively. Protraction endpoint for each rear leg shows a significant positive correlation with the simultaneous position of the ipsilateral middle leg (Figs 1,2; Table 1). An analogous, but somewhat weaker, correlation exists between the protraction endpoint of each middle leg and the position of the ipsilateral front leg.
This coordination of spatial parameters was tested experimentally by manipulating the position of the forward leg. When a middle leg is restrained in various positions, the ipsilateral rear leg adjusts its protraction endpoint accordingly (Fig. 3). However, its retraction endpoint does not undergo parallel shifts; consequently, step amplitude, protraction duration, and step frequency all change as a function of middle leg position. When a sinusoidal movement is imposed on either a middle or front leg, the adjacent, caudal leg continuously adjusts its protraction endpoint according to the momentary position of the forward leg (Fig. 4). This adjustment is again accompanied by changes in step amplitude and step period, changes which may affect all five unrestrained legs.
The anterior-posterior leg position measured in our experiments primarily reflects the angle of the coxo-thoracic joint; this angle is monitored by hair rows and hairplates located on the coxa (Wendler, 1964; Baessler, 1965). Modifying these external proprioceptive inputs revealed both inter- and intrasegmental control functions. The caudally situated hair rows are important for measuring the small variations in the position of the target leg which occur during normal walking. Immobilization of these hairs on a middle leg causes the mean protraction endpoint of the ipsilateral rear leg to shift forward (Fig. 5: o1 versus C) and reduces or eliminates the step by step correlation of this protraction endpoint with middle leg position (Table 1). The additional immobilization of the cranially situated hairplates usually leads to a caudal shift in the protraction endpoint of the ipsilateral rear leg (Fig. 5: o2 versus o1) and reduces any residual correlation (Table 1). The actual position of the protraction endpoint reflects an integration of intersegmental signals representing the position of the target leg and intrasegmental signals from the sensory hairs on the protracting leg. Both operations may affect the duration of protraction in both the operated target leg and the adjacent, caudal leg.
Key words: Locomotion, leg coordination, proprioceptors
Submitted on May 31, 1982
Accepted on October 6, 1982
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Sponberg and R. J. Full Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 433 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Borgmann, H. Scharstein, and A. Buschges Intersegmental Coordination: Influence of a Single Walking Leg on the Neighboring Segments in the Stick Insect Walking System J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1685 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Cruse, V. Durr, and J. Schmitz Insect walking is based on a decentralized architecture revealing a simple and robust controller Phil Trans R Soc A, January 15, 2007; 365(1850): 221 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ebeling and V. Durr Perturbation of leg protraction causes context-dependent modulation of inter-leg coordination, but not of avoidance reflexes J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 209(11): 2199 - 2214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Linder Self-organization in a Simple Task of Motor Control Based on Spatial Encoding Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 2005; 13(3): 189 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Durr Context-dependent changes in strength and efficacy of leg coordination mechanisms J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2253 - 2267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ch. Ludwar, M. L. Goritz, and J. Schmidt Intersegmental Coordination of Walking Movements in Stick Insects J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1255 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Durr and T. Matheson Graded Limb Targeting in an Insect Is Caused by the Shift of a Single Movement Pattern J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1754 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Durr, A. F. Krause, J. Schmitz, and H. Cruse Neuroethological Concepts and their Transfer to Walking Machines The International Journal of Robotics Research, March 1, 2003; 22(3-4): 151 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kindermann Behavior and Adaptability of a Six-Legged Walking System with Highly Distributed Control Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 2001; 9(1): 16 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Fischer, J. Schmidt, R. Haas, and A. Buschges Pattern Generation for Walking and Searching Movements of a Stick Insect Leg. I. Coordination of Motor Activity J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Duysens, F. Clarac, and H. Cruse Load-Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture: Comparative Aspects Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 83 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Cruse, Ch. Bartling, M. Dreifert, J. Schmitz, D.E. Brunn, J. Dean, and T. Kindermann Walking: A Complex Behavior Controlled by Simple Networks Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 1995; 3(4): 385 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||