(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. Six models that predict the expected shift in visual pigment {lambda}max ({Delta}{lambda}max=A2{lambda}max–A1{lambda}max) when one opsin is combined with vitamins A1 and A2 chromophores as a function of the {lambda}max of the vitamin A1 member. These models are compared with the observed values for rods, middle-wavelength-sensitive (MWS) and long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) cones in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum). Lines representing each model are from Bridges (Bridges, 1965) (gray dotted), from Dartnall and Lythgoe (Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965) (gray dashed), from Tsin et al. (Tsin et al., 1981) (gray dotted and dashed), from Whitmore and Bowmaker (Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989) (black dotted and dashed), from Harosi (Harosi, 1994) (solid black), and from Parry and Bowmaker (Parry and Bowmaker, 2000) (black dashed). The observed range for rods, MWS and LWS cones based on the mean per fish are plotted as filled circles. The spectral shift observed in rods and LWS cones falls within the predicted range of the models, indicating that the observed variance in {lambda}max values can be explained by a change in chromophore ratio. The spectral shift of MWS cones lies outside the range predicted by all six models and therefore the variance in {lambda}max of MWS cones cannot be explained by a shift in chromophore ratio alone: a second RH2 opsin subtype is implicated in this shift.