(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. for affects feeding rate and food acquisition. (A) Gut dissections from larvae fed blue yeast paste for 15 min also indicated that forR larvae ingested significantly less food than fors or fors2 larvae (F(2,26)=5.32, P<0.05). (B) The rate that the gut filled with food was measured by feeding larvae on a yeast paste with Brilliant Blue dye, extracting the gut, and comparing the length of the gut with food to the length of the entire gut. Gut size did not differ significantly between strains (F(2,67)=0.86, P=0.43). Sitter (fors and fors2) larvae filled their gut more quickly than rover (forR) larvae (10–20 min feeding, two-way-ANOVA F(8,36)=70.53 P=0.0008; effect of strain, F(2,36)=5.82, P=0.007; effect of time, F(2,36)=5.52, P=0.008; one-way ANOVAs: 5 min, P=0.82; 10 min, P=0.10; 15 min, P=0.05; 20 min, P=0.04). This difference stabilized after about 25–30 min of feeding when the midguts of all larvae become saturated with the blue yeast paste, resulting in no measurable difference in food intake (one-way ANOVAs: 25 min, P=0.85; 30 min, P=0.68). (C) Rovers showed significantly less food intake on fructose–agarose (F(2,87)=12.20, P<0.0001; forR vs fors, P<0.0001; forR vs fors2, P<0.0002; fors vs fors2, P=0.92) and glucose–agarose (F(2,87)=3.98, P=0.02; forR vs fors, P=0.0078; forR vs fors2, P=0.048; fors vs fors2, P=0.47) when food intake was measured using Carmine dye. (D) Drosophila larvae use their mouthhooks for both food ingestion and locomotion. We found no significant correlation between mouthhook movements and amount of dye ingested when larvae fed on a glucose–agarose substrate (R2=0.18, P=0.11).