(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. Comparison of timing (A) and magnitude (B) of the observed and calculated forces exerted by bluegill on tethered prey. Time 0 (in B) is the first frame digitized in the image sequence (~10 frames prior to the onset of gape, arbitrarily selected for each sequence). The timing differences between the observed and calculated peak force were not significantly different than 0 (average 2.2±0.83 ms; RM-ANOVA F1,3=3.76, P>0.15) and were linearly correlated (average R2=0.78±0.06; average slope=0.89±0.09; N=4 fish). Similarly, the peak calculated force was not significantly different than the observed one (average deviation=–0.012±0.135 N; RM-ANOVA F1,3=0.45, P>0.54) and the two magnitudes were correlated (average R2=0.59±0.07; average slope=0.78±0.1; N=4 fish). Different symbols represent data for the four fish studied, diagonal line represents the case of X=Y.