(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Shear and normal forces in isolated gecko setal arrays on a glass surface. Motion in normal and shear axes was controlled at 50 µm s-1. (A) Setal array during load (1), drag (2) and pull (3) (LDP) against the curvature of the setal shafts exhibits Coulomb friction. Negative F|| represents the reaction forces during a drag to the left. However, no difference between static and kinetic friction was evident. Compression force F {perp} was approx. 3.2 times shear force F||. (B) Setal array during LDP with the curvature of the setal shafts compressed initially, and then was pulled into tension as the setal tips adhered. Positive F|| represents the reaction forces during a drag to the right. Adhesion was sustained during the 100 µm drag step (2). (C) Normal vs shear force during LDP against curvature of the setal shafts. F{perp} and F|| followed a path along the Coulomb friction cone (red broken line of slope 1/µ). (D) Normal vs shear force during LDP with curvature of the setal shafts. F{perp} and F|| followed a path that began initially along the Coulomb friction cone (red broken line of slope 1/µ). As adhesion developed, the forces converged on F{perp}=-F||tan{alpha}*, where {alpha}*{approx}30° (blue broken line).