Fig. 3. (A) COM paths over a step cycle for one individual during the three
treatments: control (C), unexpected substrate drops (U) and visible substrate
drops (V). All U trials for this individual are shown to illustrate
within-subject variation (solid blue lines), with a representative V trial
(dotted red line) and C step (broken green line) drawn for comparison. Thin
gray lines represent the aerial phase of the step. In (B) the periods of
analysis are schematically illustrated. In all cases, the COM trajectory was
calculated between subsequent aerial phase peaks in COM height. During level
running this corresponded to subsequent COM apexes, where
EKv is zero and EP is at a maximum.
However, in the U and V trials the COM generally did not return to stable
periodic motion within the perturbed step, and the COM was often moving
downward at the beginning of the aerial phase following the perturbation. In
these cases, there was a net gain in EKv, and the aerial
phase peak in COM height occurred at the beginning of the flight phase. This
EKv must be dealt with during the next stance phase
because total vertical energy
(EV=EP+EKv), total
horizontal energy (EH=EKh) and total
mechanical energy (Ecom) can change only during ground
contact.